(at Goddamn-Sachs, at JP Morgan, and at all the other financial funds & front-banks for the Rotschield's owned so-called 'Federal' Reserve very privately owned monopoly fiat-money printing, fractional 'reserve' central bankers' banking cabal) -
- in the name of "WAR ON TERROR" of course - is an ATROCITY against the American constitution, an ATROCITY that is DEEPLY ROOTED in JEWISH SUPREMACY and the 'right' of Jewish leaders to EXECUTE and MASSACRE any and all opponents of the dictatorial, theocratic old testament Jewish tribal-nation?
Don't take our word for it: Here's Jewish writer David Plotz, commenting on the BIBLICAL INSTRUCTION on how Jews could legally have their SONS MURDERED in Slate on-line magazine's "blogging the bible" series, Dueteronomy chapter:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/blogging_the_bible/features/2006/the_complete_book_of_deuteronomy/moses_turns_into_jackie_mason.htmlMr. Plotz should not be so cute when asking about "naughty girls." As he explains elsewhere in his "blogging the bible" series, daughters were considered PROPERTY of their fathers, and could be sold as slaves - sold off as sex-slaves - at the whim of their fathers. Long before today's Muslim world started the dismal practice of "honor killings," bronze age Judaism led the way, and "disobediant" daughters (much less slave girls) could be beaten, sold off, or murdered without a second glance.
Whoa, Nelly! Here comes a law that must give biblical literalists conniptions. If you have a disobedient son, then you can take him to the elders of the town and proclaim,
"'This son of ours is disloyal and defiant; he does not heed us. He is a glutton and a drunkard.' Thereupon the men of his town shall stone him to death. Thus you will sweep out evil from your midst."
What are we supposed to make of these son-killing guidelines? Did the Israelites ever actually carry out such child murders? How old did the son have to be? And how wayward did he have to be to qualify? And what about naughty girls?
It's particularly unsettling that Deuteronomy calmly condones the murder of children, given its earlier attacks on the Canaanites. Throughout Deuteronomy, when Moses and God explain why all Canaanites deserve to be driven from the Promised Land and murdered, their No. 1 reason is that the Canaanites practice child sacrifice. **Yet here we are, stoning our own bad kids to death.** Like the Chapter 13 requirement that we murder idolatrous relatives, the son-killing directive is a reminder that biblical morality is often not conservative at all, but massively, disruptively radical
SO - at a glance, without even going any further, we can see that Judaism tolerates the MURDER and/or ENSLAVEMENT of ONE'S OWN Jewish children.... so how can any other, non-Jewish people possibly have any more rights than jewish children under the harsh, if not barbaric, Judaic legal code and "justice" system?
Mr. Plotz's "blogging" series is an especially good source for finding these DEHUMANIZING BIBLE ATROCITIES, especially given Mr. Plotz's Jewish outlook and millieu. Sometimes (as above) Plotz is righttfully indignant about these tyrannical and murderous biblical instructions; other times Plotz washes his hands of the atrocities, for example calmly stating that since the Jews were deprived and on the edge of survival during their 40 years wandering the desert, they were thereby entitled to visit massacres and wholesale genocidal conquests on the people who resided in the Caanan Valley, the so-called "holy land."
"People" being the operative word here: DO NON-JEWS QUALIFY as "people" or are they merely sticks to be gathered for firewood, to be used as the Jews deem appropriate?
For the NDAA bill does to Americans, what STALIN's PURGES DID to Russians (and to the people from all the other nationalities from the 'Soviet' Republics of the USSR): creates a climate of GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT - a CRIMINAL AGAINST THE STATE until proven otherwise; a DEHUMANIZED SLAVE in the GULAG SYSTEM, unless some freakish sense of humanity, mercy, or morality creeps in to the bureaucratic gulag administrators' consciences.
That the NDAA bill potentially sets up a "PRISON WITHOUT PROOF" system run by powerful government bureaucrats and appartchiks is beyond dispute.
Whether or not the NDAA is a PRODUCT of the despicable JEWISH WAR LOBBY may be up for debate - but with JEWISH
** (to see for your own eyes just how much of a PUPPET John McCain is to the Jewish war lobby, merely do an internet "images" search for "John McCain + Joe Lieberman" - Lieberman of course the treacherous, back-stabbing "Democrat" turncoat who is an unabashed orthodox jew, warmonger, & Netanyahu toady Likudnik jewish supremacist; who, wouldn't ya know it, was also the Senate "mentor" to young, "liberal" and minority Senator Barack Obama when Obama was first elected to the senate in 2006.)
Well, the good news is that according to this InfoWars.com report, the State of Virginia has come to their senses, and is now in the process of REJECTING this federal, TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP Gestapo/Commissar power-grab.
The bad news is that InforWars, the "Tea Party," and many of the other political activists who are most actively opposed to the increasingly draconian NEO-CON (jewish war lobby + jewish dominated financial swindlers) power-grab, are often "Christian" based, which is to say, based on the Christian fundamentalist notions that there will be a "judgement day," whereby god will not merely allow religious leaders to EXECUTE wayward sons; but god, himself, will run some kind of ETERNAL TORTURE CAMP, aka "hell" to punish the wayward.... making the tens of thousands (upon millions, in aggregate) of stinking corpses of the wholesale massacres perpetrated by the bloodthirsty god of the Jewish bible,
seem merciful by comparison!
NDAA Nullification Passes Virginia Senate by a Veto-Proof 39-1 Vote
Michael Boldin, Tenth Amendment CenterFebruary 28, 2012
Today, the Virginia Senate took a firm stand in support of liberty, the Constitution for the United States, and the Constitution of Virginia by voting in favor of House Bill 1160 (HB1160), the “NDAA Nullification Act.”
The final vote was 39-1.
After a motion to recommit (delay until next year) went down to the wire before being rejected yesterday (report here), groups across the political spectrum activated in support of the legislation, which codifies in law that no agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia – including defense forces and national guard troops, will comply with or assist the federal government in any way under it’s newly claimed powers to arrest and detain without due process.
INTERNMENT: NEVER AGAIN
The bill’s primary sponsor, Delegate Bob Marshall, had this to say in support:
“During World War II, the federal government incarcerated tens of thousands of loyal Japanese Americans in the name of national security. By this bill, Virginia declares that it will not participate in similar modern-day efforts.
Even President Obama had questions about the bill, when he promised the American people that he would not use the unrestrained powers it granted him — but why should we trust any President with such powers?
There are moments in our history when our liberties hang in the balance. This is one of those moments. I urge the Senate…to lead the way in the nation to ensure that Virginia will not cooperate when the Federal Government strays off the reservation with laws that take away the civil liberties of our citizens.” (cont'd)